Library Element Report

Open Science and its role in universities: a roadmap for cultural change

Uploaded by RRI Tools on 29 May 2018

Open Science and its role in universities: a roadmap for cultural change. LERU Advice Paper. no.24 - may 2018. Authors: Paul Ayris, Alea López de San Román, Katrien Maes & Ignasi Labastida 

Open Science opens up new ways in which research/education/innovation are undertaken, archived and curated, and disseminated across the globe. Open Science is not about dogma per se; it is about greater efficiency and productivity, more transparency and a better response to interdisciplinary research needs. The LERU universities are convinced Open Science brings new and exciting opportunities for the scholarly community and for how academics interact with society. They also  realise, however, that this transition will not be straightforward to deliver. There are challenges that lie ahead. For universities and other stakeholders to embrace Open Science principles, policies and practices, there needs to be a culture change in these organisations if this transition is to be successfully negotiated.

This paper discusses the eight pillars of Open Science identified by the European Commission, analyses what the introduction of Open Science approaches means at university level in each of these eight themed areas and identifies possible benefits and challenges.

  1. The future of scholarly publishing
  2. FAIR data 
  3. The European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) 
  4. Education and skills 
  5. Rewards and incentives 
  6. Next-generation metrics
  7. Research integrity 
  8. Citizen science

For each of the eight Open Science areas, recommendations about what universities can do are formulated. Evidently, they imply a broader supportive environment and productive interactions with external stakeholders, too. Next to the recommendations in these eight areas, the paper offers some high level conclusions and recommendations to transition at the institutional level and provides a set of questions which universities can use to measure their progress in implementing Open Science approaches institutionally.

The LERU universities fully acknowledge that Open Science represents a complex and multi-dimensional process of transition, different for every university. The 41 recommendations in this LERU paper do not represent a prioritisation of topics, nor an exhaustive list of actions to be taken by universities. They, and the paper as a whole, are intended to serve as a roadmap to accompany universities´ efforts towards Open Science, leaving room for each institution to carve out its own path, strategy and actions.


Related Resources