Library Element Article

Nepotism and sexism in peer-review✎
👍
0
Uploaded by RRI Tools on 01 April 2016
Research Community Policy Makers Education Community Gender Equality peer review women´s careers postdoctoral fellowship gender discrimination

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES ✎

Weneras, C. & Wold, A., 1997. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature. 387, pp. 341-343

SUMMARY OF CONTENT ✎

In the first-ever analysis of peer-review scores for postdoctoral fellowship applications, the system is revealed as being riddled with prejudice. The policy of secrecy in evaluation must be abandoned

FORMAT ✎

PDF

ACCESS ✎

Open

LANGUAGE ✎

English

EXPERTISE ✎

Beginner , Practitioner

LINK ✎

http://advance.cornell.edu/documents/nepotism_and_sexism.pdf

Related conversations

Start a conversation
There are no conversations yet, start one
Go to the conversations forum
Element URL
Share

Related Resources

Project
OPENing UP new methods, indicators and tools for peer review, dissemination of research results, and impact measurement
 open science open access peer review open scholarship
Library Element
Who’s Afraid of Peer Review?
 open access quality peer review scientific knowledge
Tool
Achieving gender balance at the top of scientific research - Guidelines and tools for institutional change
 structural change gender-aware management women´s careers discrimination
Tool
Women, research and universities: excellence without gender bias
 structural change gender bias gender dimension women´s careers universities
Tool
The genSET Consensus Report: Recommendations for Action on the Gender Dimension in Science
 structural change recruitment gender dimension women´s careers gender in research content